Citation: New World Communications of Tampa, Inc., d/b/a WTVT-TV v. Jane Akre
February 14, 2003. Denied February 25, 2004.
866 So. 2d 1231 District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Facts: In 1998, investigative reporting team, Jane Akre and her husband Steve Wilson, brought suit against their employer WVTV, a subsidiary of Fox TV, under violation of Florida’s whistle-blower statutes. They argued that the station had terminated their employment under grounds of retaliation because the team refused to suppress and distort the contents of a story regarding the controversial Bovine Growth Hormone in Florida’s cattle. Additional claims also brought forth included declaratory relief and breach of contract. After a four-week trial, a jury found against Wilson on all of his claims. Akre decided to drop allegations concerning declaratory relief and the court allowed for continuance based on her whistle-blower claims. The jury granted a monetary award of $425,000 in damages to Akre based on retaliation claims established by whistle-blower statute.
In 2004, WTVT appealed the whistle-blower statute judgment. The final judgment was reversed after the 13th Florida Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that Akre had failed to a make a claim under the whistle-blowers statute. The court stated that technically speaking, it is not against any rule, law, or regulation to deliberately lie or distort the news on a television broadcast. Issues: Did Ms. Akre’s claims meet the whistle-blower statue? Was the “news distortion policy” adopted as rule by the FCC? Rule of Law: The Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989 is a United States federal law that protects federal whistleblowers who work for the government and report agency misconduct. (www.wikipedia.org/whistleblower.com). The Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Act calls for whistleblowing in the context of publicly traded companies such as Fox News. Both the Whistleblower and the SOX act...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document